Proven Outcomes. Real Impact.

Measured. Validated. Defensable.

Review independently validated findings, peer-reviewed research, and measured client results. Every result includes the population, timeframe, methodology, and source needed to evaluate it.

Measured. Validated. Sustained.

41%

ER Visits & Hospital Reduction

Reduction in combined hospital admissions and ER visits per 1,000 members by Year 4 across multiple employer populations representing 33,459 members

23% → 16%

High-Risk Diabetes Reduction

Across 7,804 participants at 15 employers, 23% reduced their health risks over two years, compared with 16% expected under the Edington Natural Flow model (P

$5.6M

Medical & Pharmacy Claims Reduction

Cumulative medical and pharmacy claims savings after program costs over three years among 299 participants in a diabetes management program

* Examples are based on de-identified analyses and outcomes from actual USPM client populations. Individual results may vary.

Independently Validated by the Validation Institute | USPM | United States Preventive Medicine

Independently Validated

USPM's outcomes and measurement methodologies have been independently validated by the Validation Institute, supporting the rigor and consistency of how results are measured, evaluated, and reported.

Results Across Populations

Diabetes Population	Weight Management	Population Health
299 Individuals	22% Weight Loss	40% Reduction
89% → 4% High-Risk Diabetes	Sustained Engagement	43% → 29% Condition Burden
$5.6M Claims Reduction	200+ Weekly Activity Minutes	ER & Hospital Utilization

Data Reveals Opportunity

01 Data Reveals Opportunity

Four Years of Lower Hospital and ER Use

Case Study

Primary Result

41% reduction in combined hospital admissions and ER visits per 1,000 members by Year 4.

The analysis evaluated utilization across asthma, cardiac and hypertension events, congestive heart failure, COPD and respiratory conditions, and diabetes. Results were evaluated against Disease Management Purchasing Consortium and Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project national benchmarks.

Multiple employer populations

N=33,459 | Four-year analysis

Source

Validation Institute analysis of USPM employer claims data, summarized in Figure 105.4 of Ronald Loeppke, Why, How, and What in Leveraging the Value of Health.

* Published Source

Read the Article

Case Study 1 Graphic | Bar Chart showing USPM impact on Annual Reduction in Combined Hospital Admissions and ER Visits

Read the Article

Health-Risk Movement Exceeded the Expected Natural Flow

02 PEER-REVIEWED MULTI-EMPLOYER RESEARCH

Health-Risk Movement Exceeded the Expected Natural Flow

Case Study

Primary Result

23% Reduced Their Health Risks compared to 16% from a Natural Flow Model

Across 7,804 participants at 15 employers, 23% reduced their health risks over two years, compared with 16% expected under the Edington Natural Flow model. The difference was statistically significant (P

Risk-category movement

High risk: 11% to 6% | Moderate risk: 29% to 23% | Low risk: 60% to 71%

Population

15 employers | N=7,804 | Two years

Method note

The Edington Natural Flow model is a historical benchmark for expected movement among health-risk categories. The study used this benchmark rather than a concurrent randomized control group.

Peer Reviewed Source

Loeppke R, Edington D, Bender J, Reynolds A. The Association of Technology in a Workplace Wellness Program With Health Risk Factor Reduction. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2013;55(3):259-264.

* Published Source

Read the Article

happy-senior-couple-celebrate-success-during

Read the Article

Data Reveals Opportunity

03 PUBLISHED CLIENT CASE

Three Years of Lower Diabetes-Related Cost and Utilization

Case Study

Primary Result

$5.6 million in cumulative medical and pharmacy claims savings after program costs over three years among 299 diabetes program participants.

The analysis evaluated utilization across asthma, cardiac and hypertension events, congestive heart failure, COPD and respiratory conditions, and diabetes. Results were evaluated against Disease Management Purchasing Consortium and Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project national benchmarks.

Population

Diabetes management population | N=299 | Three years

Supporting Result 1

Approximately 80% reduction in hospital inpatient days.

Supporting Result 1

Nearly 50% reduction in total medical and pharmacy costs.

Published Results

Ronald Loeppke. Why, How, and What in Leveraging the Value of Health. Lifestyle Medicine, 3rd edition, Chapter 105, Section 105.6.1.

* Published Source

Read the Article

Read the Article

Lower Medical Cost and Chronic-Condition Burden

04 CLIENT CLAIMS ANALYSIS

Lower Medical Cost and Chronic-Condition Burden

Case Study

Primary Result

23% Reduced Their Health Risks compared to 16% from a Natural Flow Model

Across 7,804 participants at 15 employers, 23% reduced their health risks over two years, compared with 16% expected under the Edington Natural Flow model. The difference was statistically significant (P

Risk-category movement

Employer population | N=1,166 | Two-year analysis

Population

Employer population | N=1,166 | Two-year analysis

Result 1

25.2% decrease in medical cost per person per year over two years.

Result 1

The share of employees identified annually with one or more of nine chronic conditions declined from 29% to 21% over two years.

Method Note

Medical-cost results reflect the documented exclusions and $100,000 stop-loss adjustment.

Peer Reviewed Source

Medical-cost results reflect the documented exclusions and $100,000 stop-loss adjustment.

Source

USPM de-identified claims analysis for the 1,166-person employer population, 2021-2023.

* Published Source

Read the Article

Read the Article

A separate case study analyzing the impact of our diabetes (type I & II) management program found even more impactful results…

* Multiyear sustained reductions in hospitalizations and ER visits (per 1,000 members)

80% reduction in Hospital Inpatient Days

Nearly 50% reduction in total medical/pharmaceutical costs

Average annual savings per participant of $6,312

Total client savings of $5.6 million after factoring in program costs

Diabetes Disease Management
Case Study

Average savings after factoring in program costs of $6,312 per program participant (diabetes) an average savings of 42% from pre-program to post program results over the three years.
After three years of USPM Diabetes Managment program.

Saving reduced the client’s diabetes related spending by $5.6 million over 3 years.

My coach stayed in contact with me, every single week, and gave me suggestions. She helped me change the way I saw and approached my environment to make my life more relaxing such as breathing techniques, meditation, identifying triggers, et cetera... Thanks all for the great work, all the material shared, and the encouraging words that I received every day.

BelindaAvalon, NJ



The USPM team has helped me very much. I had been struggling to continue since I started in December 2015. But I never quit and have lost almost 50 pounds in a little over a year, and I will take it! Thank you for always being too kind and taking care of my health.

Blyn DellRapids, SD



It all started on February 4, 2016 when I was diagnosed with diverticulosis and weighed 315 pounds. A year later, I’ve lost over 50 pounds; and, with the help of my coach being compassionate and very knowledgeable, I’ve kept it off!

RosalindVirginia Beach, VA



Between April and August, I have lost 24 pounds with the help of a trainer and my Registered Nurse Care Manager. Now I am exercising at Planet Fitness; I just joined in December when they opened in my home town. I would never have thought I would be doing this type of thing at 61!

GayleWaynesboro, GA



The Preventive Plan’s routine labs and biometrics screening found I had dangerous levels of glucose, and I was not aware I was a diabetic. I changed my entire lifestyle and now have normal glucose levels and am hoping to come off the diabetes medication.

ShannonJacksonville, FL



Thanks for all of your assistance to get me on the correct path. The best news of all is that I had my departmental physical today. I had the best blood pressure in years… 127/60.

RickyHanover, VA



I can’t believe my transformation. Over the last three years, I have eaten better and exercised. I saw my doctor and everything is in normal range for my lab work. I have lost over 100 pounds and plan on running a 10K.

MichaelSioux Falls, SD



After working with my health coach, my goal was to run a 5K – and it’s completed! I ran daily for 30 days to build up my strength and energy to complete the “Hustle for the Puzzle” run for autism awareness. I completed my running program, and then I ran my 5K and completed it in just under an hour. I felt accomplished and wanted to run more!

HermanPort Jervis, NY



Before the body tone challenge, I was doing nothing for exercise. This was a good way for me because I had to try exercises that I had never done before. I plan to keep exercising, as I know my health has suffered because I haven’t been exercising.

BrianSioux Falls, SD



Thanks to The Preventive Plan, I am more conscientious of my daily walk of 2 miles. It helps curb my appetite and reminds me to make healthier choices on my snacks and meals. When I don’t get my daily walk in for a week, then I definitely notice it on the scale. I also do yoga for relaxation and spiritual comfort. It adds to my healthy lifestyle and helps me focus on my blessings from God.

TeresaUrbandale, IA



They are short (so I can watch them at work), but they are really informative and interesting… For example, I never knew why overweight people tended to have high blood pressure. The video on how fat impacts the kidneys was fascinating to me.

CorinneFargo, ND



USPM’s root caused based approach significantly reduced health risks across the covered population:

41% of high risk participants were no longer high risk after 2 years*
52% of high risk participants were no longer high risk after 5 years*

Program participants also realized clinically significant movement in key biomarkers

21%

BMI

20%

Glucose

20%

Cholesterol

32%

HDL Values

* Multiyear sustained reductions in hospitalizations and ER visits (per 1,000 members)

"USPM is a shining example of what's possible when companies do wellness right."

Marty Makary

MD & FDA Commissioner

*Intel-GE Care Innovations Validation Institute
*Lifestyle Medicine, Third Edition, edited by James M. Rippe, MD. Section Figure 105.4, “USPM Total Hospital Admits and ER Visits across Conditions vs. *DMPC and HCUP National Averages (per 1000 Members).,” p. 12 of 15
*¹ Lifestyle Medicine, Third Edition, edited by James M. Rippe, MD. Section 105.6.2, “Intel-GE Validation Institute Recognition of U.S. Preventive Medicine,” p. 11 of 15
*Lifestyle Medicine, Third Edition, edited by James M. Rippe, MD. Section 105.6.1 “Client Case Study Results,” p. 10 of 15
*Loeppke, R; Edington, D; Bender, J; Reynolds, A. “The Association of Technology in a Workplace Wellness Program with Health Risk Factor Reduction” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine: March 2013; Volume 55, Number 3: pp 259–264
*Loeppke, R; “The Why, How and What in Leveraging the Value of Health.” in Rippe, James, M. (Ed.) Lifestyle Medicine, Third Edition. CRC Press: Boca Raton, Florida: May 2019.
*Loeppke, R; Edington, D; Bender, J; Reynolds, A. “The Association of Technology in a Workplace Wellness Program with Health Risk Factor Reduction” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine: March 2013; Volume 55, Number 3: pp 259–264

Reduce cost. Improve outcomes. Engage your population with a clinically driven model built to deliver measurable performance.

Proven Outcomes. Real Impact.

Measured. Validated. Defensable.

41%

ER Visits & Hospital Reduction

Reduction in combined hospital admissions and ER visits per 1,000 members by Year 4 across multiple employer populations representing 33,459 members

23% → 16%

High-Risk Diabetes Reduction

Across 7,804 participants at 15 employers, 23% reduced their health risks over two years, compared with 16% expected under the Edington Natural Flow model (P

$5.6M

Medical & Pharmacy Claims Reduction

Cumulative medical and pharmacy claims savings after program costs over three years among 299 participants in a diabetes management program

* Examples are based on de-identified analyses and outcomes from actual USPM client populations. Individual results may vary.

Independently Validated

USPM's outcomes and measurement methodologies have been independently validated by the Validation Institute, supporting the rigor and consistency of how results are measured, evaluated, and reported.

Results Across Populations

Proven Population Health Performance

Measured outcomes. Validated methodologies. Meaningful impact.

01

Data Reveals Opportunity

Four Years of Lower Hospital and ER Use

Case Study

Primary Result

41% reduction in combined hospital admissions and ER visits per 1,000 members by Year 4.

The analysis evaluated utilization across asthma, cardiac and hypertension events, congestive heart failure, COPD and respiratory conditions, and diabetes. Results were evaluated against Disease Management Purchasing Consortium and Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project national benchmarks.

Multiple employer populations

N=33,459 | Four-year analysis

Source

Case Study

Primary Result

23% Reduced Their Health Risks compared to 16% from a Natural Flow Model

Across 7,804 participants at 15 employers, 23% reduced their health risks over two years, compared with 16% expected under the Edington Natural Flow model. The difference was statistically significant (P

Risk-category movement

Population

15 employers | N=7,804 | Two years

Method note

Peer Reviewed Source

Case Study

Primary Result

$5.6 million in cumulative medical and pharmacy claims savings after program costs over three years among 299 diabetes program participants.

The analysis evaluated utilization across asthma, cardiac and hypertension events, congestive heart failure, COPD and respiratory conditions, and diabetes. Results were evaluated against Disease Management Purchasing Consortium and Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project national benchmarks.

Population

Diabetes management population | N=299 | Three years

Supporting Result 1

Supporting Result 1

Published Results

Case Study

Primary Result

23% Reduced Their Health Risks compared to 16% from a Natural Flow Model

Across 7,804 participants at 15 employers, 23% reduced their health risks over two years, compared with 16% expected under the Edington Natural Flow model. The difference was statistically significant (P

Risk-category movement

Population

Employer population | N=1,166 | Two-year analysis

Result 1

25.2% decrease in medical cost per person per year over two years.

Result 1

The share of employees identified annually with one or more of nine chronic conditions declined from 29% to 21% over two years.

Method Note

Medical-cost results reflect the documented exclusions and $100,000 stop-loss adjustment.

Peer Reviewed Source

Source

Published Evidence and Independent Validation Links

Two-yearMulti-employer Study

N=7,804 across 15 employers

One-yearMulti-employer Study

N=7,804 across 15 employers

Published chapter

Why, How, and What in Leveraging the Value of Health

Ron Loeppke

Independent validation

* Multiyear sustained reductions in hospitalizations and ER visits (per 1,000 members)

80% reduction in Hospital Inpatient Days

Nearly 50% reduction in total medical/pharmaceutical costs

Average annual savings per participant of $6,312

Total client savings of $5.6 million after factoring in program costs

Testimonials

Healthy living made fun.

Peer Reviewed Medical Journal Findings

A separate study published in the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine showed:

Program participants also realized clinically significant movement in key biomarkers

21%

Two-year
Multi-employer Study

One-year
Multi-employer Study

Peer Reviewed
Medical Journal Findings